Duelingbook Forum

Lil Oldman wrote:What I've gathered is that Nazis didn't have anything to do with the state of the world in 1940.

This comparison is implying homophobes have eberything to do with gender politics
Nazi: homophobes; state of the world in1940: gender politics.

And once again, you're circling around showing how dishonest you really are. And youre projecting, we "cycling back" because you complained that i "moved the goal post" now youre complaining that im remind you what the original goal post was...? Sounds like you have nothing more...

Now you're just circling around. Are actually capable of having an honest conversation? Not with someone ignorant of what were discussing? If you cant point to a responce that warrents the tantrum you threw in this thread, then admit you were wrong and move on. And once again, you're circling aroun...

And here you move the goal post. How about you try being honest for once in your life :) The "goal post" was you pointing out where i mentioned gender politics unprovoked. Which you still havent done. Now you're just circling around. Are actually capable of having an honest conversation? ...

When did i mention anything on the subject unprovoked. Never, when did you? Several times. Show me where in this thread i have brought up gender politics. Literally first post. As been told to you multiple times. My first post was: "Except the homophobic ones..." No mention of gender, gen...

So basically you realized that you fucked up and that your reading comprehension needs work. Also for a guy who is "too busy", sure is spending hours on here. No, you proved that you think calling someone homophobic = gender politics which proves you know nothing on the subject and that y...

Which involves what? Gay people, which are also what? A topic of gender politics. =/= Only gay people are a topic of gender politics. Want to try again? Nope youve already proved my point. So basically you realized that you fucked up and that your reading comprehension needs work. Also for a guy wh...

Where did I state that gender politics only encompasses gays? "Which invole what? Gay people? Which are also what? A topic of gender politics?" Nice try burying the lead and straw manning, come back when you deal with youre clearly intetnalized homophobia and become self aware eniugh to s...

Which involves what? Gay people, which are also what? A topic of gender politics. Also fun fact, homo = same and phobia = fear. Specifically an extreme fear or aversion. So to throw down the word as lightly as you did only does a disservice to those who actually have that phobia. Wow... you must be...

You do realize that the term homophobic is very much intertwined with gender and gender politics right? "Homophobia: dislike of or prejudice against gay people" Your ignorance is showing. Which involves what? Gay people, which are also what? A topic of gender politics. Also fun fact, homo...

No, it implys that i dont appreciate judge or judges, If any, that are homophobic. it does not imply a judge or judges are. Yes it does, YOU DON'T GET TO DECIDE HOW SOMEONE WILL INTERPRET WHAT YOU SAY And this is why we must speak with clear intent. So misunderstandings cannot happen. And when they...

Literally first post. As been told to you multiple times. My first post was: "Except the homophobic ones..." No mention of gender, gender politics, nothing, try again. You do realize that the term homophobic is very much intertwined with gender and gender politics right? "Homophobia:...

You were the one who brought it up though, you then try to play it off as you didn't, then proceeded to troll, then started to argue with what engagement means. C'mon we're not stupid. When did i mention anything on the subject unprovoked. Never, when did you? Several times. Show me where in this t...

No, it implys that i dont appreciate judge or judges, If any, that are homophobic. it does not imply a judge or judges are. Yes it does, YOU DON'T GET TO DECIDE HOW SOMEONE WILL INTERPRET WHAT YOU SAY And this is why we must speak with clear intent. So misunderstandings cannot happen. And when they...

You are though, just by replying to me. Ok then, heres something to consider: for someone so desperate to "not bring gender politics into this" you hypocritcally were the one who kept trying to have that conversation brough it up a dozen times, antagonized to try and get a responce, shout...

No, you're replying to me, which is engagement. So yes, you are engaging with me. Nope im not engaging your ranting, im staying on topic and reporting your harrassment, meanwhile you continue to harrass and continue trying to drag other threads into this one, the only one bring gender politics to t...

You claim you won't engage with me, yet you still engage with me. You must have a really smooth brain to think that statement would even work in your favor. nope, im engaging the topic, you are continuing to rant. No, you're replying to me, which is engagement. So yes, you are engaging with me. Nop...

Renji Asuka wrote:

Excellion wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Nice alt bruh

not one of mine, and its on a different subject.

Not very convincing

Probably because i dont need to convince you, i know they arent my alts.

Lil Oldman wrote:Bruh we got 10 different threads about basically the same point lmao

No we dont? This threads about the orientation setting and adding pansexual to it, the other threads are about gender.

You had something to say, otherwise you wouldn't had brought it up in your first reply. Try again loser. and you wonder why i wont engage you when you act like a child, again you think someone who resorts to name calling has anything constructive to add? no You brought gender politics into a discus...