Duelingbook Forum

You not seeing judges online doesn't make them a glorified club all by itself. I already mentioned the thousands of calls individual judges have taken, let alone whatever the full total is if you add all of the judges together. Since you've brought these up though, why is it Genexwrecker says they ...

I'm aware If you were aware the you would realise donating doesn't get more judges it only helps keep the servers up. more people would want to be a judge for a thriving site, more donations means more QOL changes, which means a better site, which attracts more players, which means more potential j...

Actually you don’t go off somebody else’s schedule when you volunteer. You go off your own. Its volunteer. Aka not something one needs go do and does when they are able to. They volunteer at places and hours that work for them not the owner. The entire point of volunteer is it something extra you d...

We are always open to hiring more judges, but for obvious reasons we are very selective. Our consideration for someone becoming a judge starts with passing the DB judge exam. We value ruling competence on DB, hence why our judge exam is (intended to be) more difficult than the Konami RC-2 exam. As ...

Genexwrecker wrote:

Red Burning wrote:Hello, I am looking for a war team to participate in. I play a wide variety of Decks, ranging from combos to stall, but I'm most adapt at stall decks

The wars section is shut down and I only keep the tournaments section as an archive

An archive for what?

We are always open to hiring more judges, but for obvious reasons we are very selective. Our consideration for someone becoming a judge starts with passing the DB judge exam. We value ruling competence on DB, hence why our judge exam is (intended to be) more difficult than the Konami RC-2 exam. As ...

We are always open to hiring more judges, but for obvious reasons we are very selective. Our consideration for someone becoming a judge starts with passing the DB judge exam. We value ruling competence on DB, hence why our judge exam is (intended to be) more difficult than the Konami RC-2 exam. As ...

You claim I can't, yet I already have, which is more proof you don't read and all you do is just worry about what your next response is going to be. Your explanation got proven wrong long ago with evidence of what he said. Don't act clueless. You know you have been proven wrong. Accept it. You have...

once again you're showing how you're intellectually dishonest. Explain. Oh sorry you can't. You know why? It is because you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence. You claim I can't, yet I already have, which is more proof you don't read and all you do is just worry about what your next res...

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference. If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest. And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest. Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the u...

Why does this require a thread? Very pointless.

Having more judges doesn't solve the issue of those judges having lives of their own to live. You want active judges, donate to the site so they can pay for judges. Or grow a pair and take the judge test yourself. Judges are not paid I'm aware If you were aware the you would realise donating doesn'...

Genexwrecker wrote:That is not how this works

If you were actually online consistently then it actually is.

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done. They are also w...

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading. Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a ni...

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that. Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thoug...

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right. But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating. Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show s...

The whole point of (head) judges is that they know the rules, so if they say something is against the rules then they ARE the source Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes. Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them Of course the point is that th...

Ah yes, the whole "Maybe you should pay attention while I selectively read" argument. Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day. Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right. But hey, I didn't know you advocated...

DarwisBellium92 wrote:This is drama, not a serious discussion bruh...

The nosense never ending story...

Don't bother reading then in the first place.