Duelingbook Forum

yea that’s our job using our judgment and opinions with the info presented to decide what to do. The rules listed apply site wide as they are the site rules. Very very few things result in an in game warning only. We also reserve the right to remove people who are nothing but problematic on the pla...

If it was factually wrong, you wouldn't had remained punished, now would you? You don't make the rules m8, the staff does. I was remained punished because the decision of the staff(s) that punished me were solely based on their opinions, and my appeal and abuse report that included screenshots as p...

Renji Asuka wrote:Behavior has everything to do with why you were punished.

And that punishment was factually wrong because my behavior couldn't have been applied to the rule that resulted in the punishment in the first place. So again, behavior has nothing to do with facts.

I've read you reasoning. And I think so has everyone else. And yet everyone disagrees. Else they wouldn't be arguing that a) Rules should also apply to DMs and b) That judges can bend the rules within reason. But every single post of yours proves that you're an immature asshole. So even if your arg...

This is such a great show. Assholes in denial are the best thing ever. I mean what they did can't be wrong because the other person did something wrong too. So clearly any reprecussions are unjust! This years mental gymnatics world championship is going great. Can't wait for it to continue. P.S.: I...

Case in point reaper don’t be an asshole it is not tolerated here and if you for some ungodly reason where not aware of it you sure as hell are now. If you harass a person in dms and tell them you will kill them I will freeze you and so will any other judge You're telling me not to be an asshole bu...

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/36739748/ns/u ... mOxXqhKiUk http://content.time.com/time/nation/art ... 81,00.html Next time, don't speak out of your ass. The first link is an extremely rare case and even then it states the exact same thing I just pointed out "Legal experts have said prosecuting th...

False, back when chat rooms were a thing in I believe the 90s (maybe early 2000s), an adult had preyed on suicidal individuals causing a lot of people to kill themselves. And guess what he was charged for that. So, yes, you CAN and WILL get into legal trouble if a person does kill themselves after ...

Harassment rules apply everywhere on the site. This should be rather obvious. Nowhere in the rules does it specify "only in duels". Also just because there is a block feature doesn't mean you can break our rules and think you magically get away with it. Think twice next time before doing ...

You do realize, you can get into legal trouble for telling someone to kill themselves right? Especially IF THEY DO DO IT. There is 0 excuse to EVER tell anyone to kill themselves. No you can't, even if cops come knocking on your door. They can't charge you for anything, you didn't kill the person, ...

rules posted are merely examples of what we may or may not want to enforce and it is up to our "OPINION" of wether or not said penalty should be applied. Being able to use that kind of judgment maturely is why we are judges. We dont just ban every person who calls somebody a noob or tells...

And no where is there a law that states I cannot cook a person alive in a sauna but that doesn’t mean it’s okay for me to do it. your logic is the kind criminals use Something being okay or not is an OPINION. In terms of facts, yes you can cook a person alive in a sauna. By your logic and the logic...

Also keep in mind that judges have some freedom in when to apply punishments. Even if not explicitly stated. So for example if there was no rule that said it was not allowed to post porn on public posts and you did anyways you still could be punished simply because a judge deemed it appropriate. Ru...

So you say we shouldn’t freeze people for harassment so long as it’s not in a game chat? Not happening Yes you shouldn't freeze people for harassment in private chat because the block option exists for a reason. Judges can't just make up rules because they feel like it, the freezing for "sever...

If you think Pends are a problem even after 5 years of recorded results, you more than likely suck at the game regardless of Pends existing or not. Also the fact that you claim "original series" decks was "fun" and wasn't "cant be abused or bore the hell out of us" lite...

What were you even harrasing about, though ? Was it something serious ? Yeah I messaged a scrub that claimed Allure of Darkness can be activated even when the user can't banish cards before said activation and I sent him rulings on it. He proceeded to call me "illiterate" (w/ other insult...

So you say we shouldn’t freeze people for harassment so long as it’s not in a game chat? Not happening Yes you shouldn't freeze people for harassment in private chat because the block option exists for a reason. Judges can't just make up rules because they feel like it, the freezing for "sever...

I was unjustly frozened by Resource Judge #3755 on the basis that I was in violation of "severe harassment" even though said "severe harassment" took place in PRIVATE chat. And the rules of this site specifically list "severe harassment" as a violation in duels not outs...

CrystalMusic wrote:
I use it quite a bit. also they would never remove this feature. the block option is there for a reason

You're notorious for being one of the most cancerous users on this site that abuses the block feature, literally supports my point

The block option should be removed, it literally does no good. Since when have you seen or experience the blocking of someone that starts to constantly message you? Never. The block option is mostly used by people that don't like to see certain posts/replies on MM, people that start the messages and...