Search found 54 matches
- Tue Jun 28, 2022 10:10 am
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
Re: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
You didn't think it would be easy did you?
- Sat Oct 05, 2019 1:26 am
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
Re: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
Dead since June and Dal was winning? You're all disappointing me.
- Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:18 am
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
- Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:25 pm
- Forum: Report Glitch
- Topic: If a card in hand is clicked on, log will reveal it.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1755
- Mood:
Re: If a card in hand is clicked on, log will reveal it.
We are currently investigating the issue. Please do note that if you are found doing this in a rated game, you WILL be set to beginner until this glitch is solved. You can continue to play unrated games during this time. This is being done instead of freezing you for cheating because the bug is a pr...
- Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:48 am
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
Re: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
Why can't you?
- Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:27 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Judge Exam
- Replies: 74
- Views: 46402
- Mood:
Re: Judge Exam
Hi, I took the exam and it says I scored 91%, but then it says 13/20. That doesn't make sense to me. Is there a mistake? The percentage is based on your score "X/80" where "X" is the number of correct answers you marked + the number of incorrect answers you did not mark. The &qu...
- Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:32 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Judge Exam
- Replies: 74
- Views: 46402
- Mood:
Re: Judge Exam
ChronosNo.XIII wrote:i just took the exam in one of the questions is stated that infernoid patrulea can "banish" itself to banish a card shouldnt it be "tribute" itself?
sorry for bad english
Looks to be a typo. It should say "tributing". Thank you for pointing it out.
- Mon Aug 20, 2018 9:40 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Judge Exam
- Replies: 74
- Views: 46402
- Mood:
Re: Judge Exam
Oh boy! I hope I pass so I can get all the girls at school to like me.
- Sat Aug 11, 2018 4:25 pm
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
- Thu Jul 12, 2018 5:06 am
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Admins turning a blind eye to toxic players in the community.
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7782
- Mood:
Re: Admins turning a blind eye to toxic players in the community.
This thread is not the appropiate place to discuss and review individual cases. You are aware we have an abuse report system in place here on the forums right? When something like this happens and there is no judge on to handle it, you could help us help you by taking a minute to submit an abuse rep...
- Wed Jul 11, 2018 8:50 am
- Forum: Report Glitch
- Topic: Frozen for no reason?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2163
- Mood:
Re: Frozen for no reason?
You can submit an appeal if you want your freeze to be reviewed.
- Fri Jul 06, 2018 10:50 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Adding a "thinking" button
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3719
- Mood:
Re: Adding a "thinking" button
This just unnecessarily clutters the already cramped UI. Just write "k" or "hold" and communicate with your opponent. If they choose not to heed your communication and attempting to halt gameplay when you type it, they're not going to care when the system types it for you either....
- Fri Jul 06, 2018 10:44 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Admins turning a blind eye to toxic players in the community.
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7782
- Mood:
Re: Admins turning a blind eye to toxic players in the community.
I understand that there is a lot of frustration for the userbase over things like this and there is not much transparency between the staff and the users that are upset. I'll try to clear some of that up. The first thing that users need to understand is that rules here on DB are much looser and tole...
- Fri Jul 06, 2018 10:33 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Admins turning a blind eye to toxic players in the community.
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7782
- Mood:
Re: Admins turning a blind eye to toxic players in the community.
Silverdude wrote:https://imgur.com/GpvNR5M like what is this
Handled
- Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:26 am
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
- Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:15 am
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Combine TCG+OCG rules for matchmaking
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1683
- Mood:
Re: Combine TCG+OCG rules for matchmaking
This is a nonexistent format and therefore is not something that will be supported in rated play.
- Fri Jul 06, 2018 2:11 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Card Sleeve Designs
- Replies: 45
- Views: 35373
- Mood:
Re: Card Sleeve Designs
Here's a zip of 79 sleeves I've made that are all bordered with a Duelingbook logo.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pyayu86j0o6ni ... s.zip?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pyayu86j0o6ni ... s.zip?dl=0
- Wed May 23, 2018 5:33 pm
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
Re: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
I've come to claim my throne.
- Fri May 18, 2018 8:23 pm
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
- Replies: 2587
- Views: 984944
- Mood:
Re: Obligatory "Last Person to Comment Wins" Thread
6 days with no comment? We can't let AnimeMasterDub win
- Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:51 pm
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: Need a way to check for cheating with banished face-downs.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2751
- Mood:
Re: Need a way to check for cheating with banished face-downs.
This is something I made Xteven aware of before the card was added and I'm hoping a fix will be coming soon. My suggestion was to enumerate banished cards. Here's an example situation: Player A has previously resolved Pot of Desires banishing 10 cards face-down. Player A then activates Pot of Dualit...