Duelingbook Forum

If Maniez assumed all these things then why didn't he say all these thing ls in the judge call? He oly thing he said was thinking for ten minutes. You can not assume someone is thinking for ten minutes when they were several factors which is why we had to wait for ten minutes. There are to many fac...

Interesting take on the matter. Where is the proof that the judge would just ignore me? I don't see how "played along" as I had shown in this thread I was basically saying that they ere no judges online when he called the judge meaning that we would simply be wasting both of outlr time. H...

There is enough proof that the opponent would have simply ignored me until the judge came in. You have still not answered that it us not my fault that if he wants to ignore me. You keep ignoring these important details which is making your replies flawed and inaccurate. If the opponent didn't know ...

I was clearly communicating and being reasonable. You weren't communicating clearly enough. As I pointed out earlier, agreeing to wait for a judge whose call you don't know the reason of since you never bothered to ask, just clicking on cards when you're not actually targeting/choosing them for an ...

I hope either tristen or genex would read this. Another suggestion is to make the entierty of ranked reserved for those who completed the judge/expert exam This wouldn't work because you need "experience" to take the judge exam to begin with, which you can currently only get by playing in...

I'd like to give my opinion on this thread, after reading through it. At first, I used to think that silence is consent, until the person resolving the effect asks "k?" I would then either reply with "k" or the thumbs up button. After reading this though, initially on sound4's si...