Duelingbook Forum

Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened. Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" w...

Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened. Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" w...

:arrow: You didn't though, you rushed into your plays, and even ignored the chat. From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your ...

You didn't though, you rushed into your plays, and even ignored the chat. From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond Does not matter, YOU CHOSE to keep playing when you CLEARLY WER...

Genexwrecker wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:This is not the place to continue this your report was handled case closed.

I know it was handled. Yet you were making false claims and other people which I had to reply.

What have I said in this thread that is incorrect?

That the judge was very lenient and given me many chances.

i swear him trying to to defend "on eff" isnt a responce is soo fucking funny like the fuck did you expect for him to do when you said that I expected him to say something that make sense. Like "resp" which is even shorter. I even waited for a response. You didn't though, you ru...

PENMASTER wrote:i swear him trying to to defend "on eff" isnt a responce is soo fucking funny like the fuck did you expect for him to do when you said that

I expected him to say something that make sense. Like "resp" which is even shorter. I even waited for a response.

Genexwrecker wrote:This is not the place to continue this your report was handled case closed.

I know it was handled. Yet you were making false claims and other people which I had to reply.

1, Silence IS NOT CONSENT PERIOD. Your opponent has the right to respond PERIOD. If they don't give you a clear go ahead, YOU DON'T CONTINUE TO PLAY. This can get you into trouble with the judges and can cause a match loss. I seen it happen. 2, Wrong, "On effect" is typically stated when ...

1, Silence IS NOT CONSENT PERIOD. Your opponent has the right to respond PERIOD. If they don't give you a clear go ahead, YOU DON'T CONTINUE TO PLAY. This can get you into trouble with the judges and can cause a match loss. I seen it happen. 2, Wrong, "On effect" is typically stated when ...

That judge was extremely lenient with you. I would not have given that many chances. How? N3sh was intentionally ignoring what I was saying. N3sh was saying to proceed the duel when the I w was saying read multiple . N3sh also was also accepting "on eff" as a response when blue player cou...

1st, Silence IS NOT CONSENT. Technically YOU CAN'T CONTINUE A PLAY WITHOUT THE OPPONENT'S PERMISSION. Unless your opponent gives you a clear okay to continue, YOU DO NOT CONTINUE. 2nd, your opponent was clearly typing to you from 4:07 onwards. So the idea that "you didn't see" is bullshit...

Can't you share the replay of this user you reported so we can see what happened? https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-30668040 here 1st, Silence IS NOT CONSENT. Technically YOU CAN'T CONTINUE A PLAY WITHOUT THE OPPONENT'S PERMISSION. Unless your opponent gives you a clear okay to continue,...

Can't you share the replay of this user you reported so we can see what happened? https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-30668040 here To answer your original question, no. The judges are not obligated to tell you the outcome of a report. It's not their job to make you feel special. Now it's ...

That judge was extremely lenient with you. I would not have given that many chances. How? N3sh was intentionally ignoring what I was saying. N3sh was saying to proceed the duel when the I w was saying read multiple . N3sh also was also accepting "on eff" as a response when blue player cou...

We very rarely actually disclose information when sending the reply of a report. We would just send a message like that saying X report has been handled and dealt with thank you and have a nice day The only time where we would actually send a message is if we knew you needed to get some information...

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:How we deal with a user or judge isnt another persons concern.

Then how are we suppost to know whether you are being honest or not?

If you think they aren't, then leave because you don't trust them, simple

Who said I don't trust them? I just want some more information to clarify some things.

How we deal with a user or judge isnt another persons concern. Then how are we suppost to know whether you are being honest or not? Because we run the website? Yes you staff run the website. However not all websites are trustworthy. SwarmhostUser gave no other information if I was right or wrong. R...

Genexwrecker wrote:How we deal with a user or judge isnt another persons concern.

Then how are we suppost to know whether you are being honest or not?

We very rarely actually disclose information when sending the reply of a report. We would just send a message like that saying X report has been handled and dealt with thank you and have a nice day The only time where we would actually send a message is if we knew you needed to get some information...