Search found 64 matches
- Mon Jul 18, 2022 6:30 pm
- Forum: Spam Paradise
- Topic: I will use this thread for saving and sharing replays with others
- Replies: 2156
- Views: 713859
Re: I will use this thread for saving and sharing replays with others
Since i wont be dueling for a while, here are some replays from my "wall of shame" i used to update: MamaRayne V. Dark (Pend.) Magicians: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=6729-4907041 *New*FlameAngel101 V.Pend. D.M. https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=6729-5467120 *New*Greekplayer13...
- Fri Jul 15, 2022 5:20 am
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
There's nothing else his shadowban could've been for. Oh I know alright, and so do they, as Genexwrecker pointed out. They only said " I don't know " because they didn't want to go against their instructions of not getting into the specifics of shadowbans... that was until Genexwrecker re...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:13 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
What else could your shadowban have been for? Isn't this what they have been asking for like, the entire thread? There's nothing else his shadowban could've been for. What else could your shadowban have been for? i dont know, you dont know, and the judges dont know, that was literally the first poi...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:04 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
Nothing else is hidden through shadowbans — only main menu posts are. If you disagree with this, list something else shadowbans are meant for besides hiding main menu posts. You can still do everything else under a shadowban — build decks, edit/upload customs/images, chat with friends, chat in publ...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:53 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
It's not speculation. Shadowbans are given for the sole purpose of hiding people's main menu posts. If you disagree with this premise, list something else shadowbans are meant to hide aside from main menu posts. If you agree with this premise, you can figure out that your shadowban was because of w...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:45 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Judge Apologists need to STFU
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15996
Re: Judge Apologists need to STFU
" Narrow scope " meaning? Where did she give such confirmation? Well whether she previously did or didn't know, she knows now. The reason for your shadowban was narrowed down to those 2 possibilities: You, or the other user who was on your VPN, posting rule-breaking stuff on the main menu...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:43 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
I already proved it by explaining that shadowbans are used for only things that have to do with the main menu. Nothing else. There is nothing else your shadowban could've been for aside from what either you, or someone on your VPN, posted on the main menu. Thats not proof, that speculation, prove i...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:40 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Judge Apologists need to STFU
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15996
Re: Judge Apologists need to STFU
I apologize for quoting the wrong person, but my point regarding your actions still stands, Apocralyph: The reason for your shadowban was narrowed down to 2 possibilities, both of which are correct: You posted rule-breaking stuff on the main menu, and you used a VPN which gave someone else the oppo...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:39 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
Again, they only say they don't know because chances are they were instructed to be vague about it, which makes sense, as they've made clear already that they're not supposed to go into the specifics about shadowbans with regular users like us, so answer my question about what else you could've bee...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:30 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Judge Apologists need to STFU
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15996
Re: Judge Apologists need to STFU
I apologize for quoting the wrong person, but my point regarding your actions still stands, Apocralyph: The reason for your shadowban was narrowed down to 2 possibilities, both of which are correct: You posted rule-breaking stuff on the main menu, and you used a VPN which gave someone else the oppo...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:29 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
Correct, because chances are that's what they were instructed to say. Kitty Trouble didn't say in the appeal that he didn't know why you were shadowbanned. He said only that he wasn't authorized to check why. He said, and I quote, " That's not something I can check for you. Just make sure to f...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:22 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
Not " Genexwrecker, Kitty Trouble, and Lantern ". Just Genexwrecker. Kitty Trouble only said she couldn't check, not that she didn't know, and you haven't yet showed any statements made by Lantern. It's not because they don't know. If it was because none of the staff knew, they'd have no ...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:21 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Judge Apologists need to STFU
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15996
Re: Judge Apologists need to STFU
I'm not defending anyone just 'cause they're a judge. I'm defending the staff's decision to shadowban you because you deserved it after what you've done. You're the only one being " salty " here. You still can't seem to figure out by now that your shadowban was indeed due to either your m...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:12 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
No, it's because they're not allowed to discuss the specifics of shadowbans that they didn't say which one of those it was, but they did make it clear it was for at least one of them, and either of them was a shadowbannable offense. A week later? Wait, did you use the VPN then make those posts the ...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:07 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Judge Apologists need to STFU
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15996
Re: Judge Apologists need to STFU
I thought the thread was supposed to focus on people not needing to type paragraphs and such when a judge is mentioned. Lets not continue the derailing please. But its not though, its about talking about people who mindlessly defend judges who do bad things (not having judges online isn't a bad thi...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:05 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
They won't specify which of those 2 things you were shadowbanned for, but regardless of which one it is, you'd still be rightfully shadowbanned. if it was one of those, the judge would have said it was one of those, they didnt, so its not :) No, it's because they're not allowed to discuss the speci...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:03 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Judge Apologists need to STFU
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15996
Re: Judge Apologists need to STFU
Genexwrecker wrote:I thought the thread was supposed to focus on people not needing to type paragraphs and such when a judge is mentioned. Lets not continue the derailing please.
if anything, this proves the original point, Someone called out a judge, kid runs to your rescue
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 8:42 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
They said they " don't know " because they're supposed to be vague about it and not go into specifics about it. I know enough based on what Genexwrecker said, what you posted on the main menu, and the VPN you admitted to using. We used process of elimination to narrow it all down to 2 pos...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 8:28 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
Again, they only say they don't know because chances are they were instructed to be vague about it, which makes sense, as they've made clear already that they're not supposed to go into the specifics about shadowbans with regular users like us, so answer my question about what else you could've bee...
- Thu Jul 14, 2022 7:33 pm
- Forum: Serious Discussions
- Topic: Shadowbanning without telling us?
- Replies: 153
- Views: 29442
Re: Shadowbanning without telling us?
Genexwrecker wrote:You either broke the rules or used a vpn either way both are your fault. Discussion over
but you dont know what, if any rule, i broke, correct, just for clarification for christian57 because hes still not getting it.