Duelingbook Forum

wikia is closing card rulings :O?

Wiki's rulings are a nice start reference. They can be false but if you have nothing else to go on realize that it may be wrong and try to ask yourself, "why would it work this way?" If you can figure out the why and how it makes sense with how you see other examples handled, you can begin...

Wouldn't these citation things be better off in their own section than placed in the ruling questions to avoid clutter? These posts aren't really asking for a question to be answered just telling information while the other questions actually want ruling answers. Nothing you have to do just food for...

Just a little more context to SRN's response: " While this card is in face-up Defense Position, change all face-up monsters on the field to Defense Position, also negate the activated effects of monsters that were in Defense Position when that effect was activated. this is a continuous effect. ...

aww look at everyone from old DN hanging out on here.
I still remember the day people thought it was broken you could use Lightning vortex through diamond dude not paying a cost and they said it was "too broken like dark hole." Oh how times have changed.